The Automatic Myth

Somewhere in school, most of us picked up an idea about what good writing is supposed to feel like: the outlines just pop out of your fingers. Don’t think. Head out of the way, hands on autopilot. And if it doesn’t feel like that — if there’s effort, if you’re aware of working — something must be wrong with you.

I believed it too. I spent years waiting for the day the thinking would stop.

Here’s what thirty-seven years in the chair taught me instead: there is no such thing as fully automatic. Not ever. Outlines do not pop out of your fingers disengaged from your brain. Writing takes concentration — real, continuous, expensive concentration. Even the easiest writing engages the brain completely.

Think of driving. After twenty years behind the wheel, driving feels automatic. It isn’t. Your attention is fully spent the entire time — it’s just spent on the road instead of the pedals. That’s what experienced writing is. The effort never left. It moved.

So the question was never effort or no effort. Every system costs full attention. The question is what the attention gets spent on — the speaker, or the system.

This matters because of what the myth does to students and reporters. Someone measuring themselves against “effortless” will always come up defective, because the standard is imaginary. They feel the work, conclude they’re broken, and quit — when the work was never the problem. The work is the job.

It’s going to be hard. That’s what this is. The only choice you get is how hard.

brevitysteno.com

Back to blog